May 5, 2009
This
episode of Visibility 9-11 welcomes John-Michael
Talboo and Stewart Bradley of the
blog Debunking the
Debunkers.
John-Michael is the creator and administrator of 911debunkers.blogspot.com
where he and Bradley debunk the "debunkers" of the 9/11 truth movement.
He has been a 9/11 activist since late 2004, and is a grassroots
organizer listed on 911truth.org for the state of Indiana,
is a member of the Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth AE911Truth.org video team, and
a founding member of the central Indiana chapter of the
activist organization We Are Change.
Stewart Bradley is an artist, documentary journalist, and political
activist living in Lancaster Pennsylvania who runs an independent
mulit-media studio. Stewart was
already investigating covert government operations before 9/11 and
since 9/11 has re-dedicated himself to exposing the public
misconceptions behind the attack. In 2004 he wrote and produced a
9/11 docudrama titled "The Proof"and has been actively promoting
9/11 research through his website, blogs, videos, and internet
debates. More at: http://bradleyinfotainment.com
Topics discussed include
the "debunkers" take on the new scientific
paper, Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust
from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe, and defence
thereof.
The MO and possible motives of defenders of the official story is
also spoke of, and put into a larger historical context. Mentioned
is a declassified CIA memo from April 1967 entitled, Countering Criticism of
the Warren Report, which states that one way to achieve this
goal is to...
"Employ propaganda assets to answer and refute the
attacks of the critics. Book reviews and feature articles
are particularly appropriate for this purpose. The unclassified
attachments to this guidance should provide useful background
material for passage to assets. Our play should point out, as
applicable, that the critics are (i) wedded to theories adopted
before the evidence was in, (ii) politically interested, (iii)
financially interested, (iv) hasty and inaccurate in their
research, or (v) infatuated with their own theories."
Direct download:
visibility911_debunkers.mp3